skills: use kal field placeholders
This commit is contained in:
@@ -9,22 +9,16 @@ When this skill triggers, first collect the minimum input needed for a KAL run,
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
## Primary behavior
|
## Primary behavior
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If the user says only `啟動KAL` or gives an incomplete kickoff, use a friendly intake reply: one short lead-in sentence plus the same 4-line template, followed by short field guidance.
|
If the user says only `啟動KAL` or gives an incomplete kickoff, use a friendly intake reply: one short lead-in sentence plus the same 4-line template, with the field guidance written inside the quotes as placeholder text.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Default wording:
|
Default wording:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```text
|
```text
|
||||||
好,我先幫你把 KAL 開題格式立起來。
|
好,我先幫你把 KAL 開題格式立起來。
|
||||||
topic: ""
|
topic: "你想研究的主題是什麼"
|
||||||
seed: ""
|
seed: "先給我起始材料,例如網址 / repo / 關鍵字 / 文件"
|
||||||
goal: ""
|
goal: "你最後想得到什麼,例如摘要 / 比較 / 評估 / 決策建議"
|
||||||
scope: ""
|
scope: "要納入或排除什麼範圍"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
說明:
|
|
||||||
- topic:你想研究的主題是什麼
|
|
||||||
- seed:先給我起始材料,例如網址 / repo / 關鍵字 / 文件
|
|
||||||
- goal:你最後想得到什麼,例如摘要 / 比較 / 評估 / 決策建議
|
|
||||||
- scope:要納入或排除什麼範圍
|
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Keep the lead-in short and natural. Do not add analysis yet.
|
Keep the lead-in short and natural. Do not add analysis yet.
|
||||||
@@ -38,13 +32,12 @@ Keep the lead-in short and natural. Do not add analysis yet.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
## Response rules
|
## Response rules
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- If the user only says `啟動KAL`, return one short friendly lead-in sentence plus the 4-line template and short field explanations.
|
- If the user only says `啟動KAL`, return one short friendly lead-in sentence plus the 4-line template with placeholder guidance inside the quotes.
|
||||||
- If the user gives some fields but not all, return the same template with known values filled in and missing ones left empty; a short natural lead-in is allowed, and keep the short explanations.
|
- If the user gives some fields but not all, return the same template with known values filled in and missing ones left as friendly placeholder guidance.
|
||||||
- If the user provides enough information, normalize it into the 4-line template and then proceed with the KAL workflow.
|
- If the user provides enough information, normalize it into the 4-line template and then proceed with the KAL workflow.
|
||||||
- Keep the intake step lightweight.
|
- Keep the intake step lightweight.
|
||||||
- Do not add unnecessary analysis before the intake is clear.
|
- Do not add unnecessary analysis before the intake is clear.
|
||||||
- If the user explicitly asks how to fill the fields, always include the explanation block.
|
- If the user explicitly asks for raw copy-paste format only, you may omit the placeholder guidance and leave empty strings.
|
||||||
- If the user explicitly asks for raw copy-paste format only, you may omit the explanation block.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Filled-template behavior
|
## Filled-template behavior
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -65,8 +58,8 @@ If the user appears to be drafting or unsure, stop after the normalized template
|
|||||||
Only use light defaults when necessary:
|
Only use light defaults when necessary:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- If `seed` is a URL and `topic` is missing, infer a short topic from the URL target if obvious.
|
- If `seed` is a URL and `topic` is missing, infer a short topic from the URL target if obvious.
|
||||||
- If `goal` is missing, leave it empty instead of guessing.
|
- If `goal` is missing, leave it as placeholder guidance instead of guessing.
|
||||||
- If `scope` is missing, leave it empty instead of guessing.
|
- If `scope` is missing, leave it as placeholder guidance instead of guessing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## KAL run behavior
|
## KAL run behavior
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -95,7 +88,8 @@ goal: "..."
|
|||||||
scope: "..."
|
scope: "..."
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- The explanation block belongs below the 4 fields by default.
|
- When information is missing, prefer placeholder text inside the quotes rather than a separate explanation block.
|
||||||
- For chat surfaces, short bullets are preferred over tables.
|
- For chat surfaces, this placeholder style is preferred because it feels like a pre-filled form.
|
||||||
- Do not turn intake into a long questionnaire.
|
- Do not turn intake into a long questionnaire.
|
||||||
- Keep it to one short lead-in, the 4 fields, and brief field hints.
|
- Keep it to one short lead-in and the 4 fields.
|
||||||
|
- Do not pre-fill missing fields with invented research content; only use short writing guidance as placeholders.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user