Add silent long-task checkpoint gate
This commit is contained in:
@@ -31,6 +31,31 @@ This especially applies to:
|
||||
|
||||
If the endpoint is predictably a user decision, the assistant should structure the run so that the final user-facing handoff is already prepared as a button interaction.
|
||||
|
||||
### Silent Long-Task Checkpoint Gate
|
||||
|
||||
If a long-task is started and it will **not naturally produce an immediate next user-visible message**, it must define a forced reporting checkpoint at startup.
|
||||
|
||||
This applies to any silent long-task pattern, including but not limited to:
|
||||
- research
|
||||
- investigation
|
||||
- debugging
|
||||
- delegation / waiting on subagents
|
||||
- background execution
|
||||
- staged analysis
|
||||
- long-running verification
|
||||
- full tests / regression tests
|
||||
- any "I’ll go do this and report back" workflow
|
||||
|
||||
At startup, the task must define:
|
||||
1. the **first checkpoint trigger** (time, stage, or event)
|
||||
2. what to report if the task is **not yet finished** by that checkpoint
|
||||
3. how to downgrade status if there is **no new evidence** (`paused` / `blocked`)
|
||||
4. how final owner handoff will work if a user decision is expected
|
||||
|
||||
### Failure rule
|
||||
|
||||
If a silent long-task was started without a forced reporting checkpoint, and the user later has to ask "why is there no update?", treat that as a workflow failure / checkpoint-lost condition.
|
||||
|
||||
### Button-driven test rule
|
||||
|
||||
If a test or validation flow is known in advance to end in a Telegram pass/fail, accept/reject, or rerun/stop decision, do not start that test in the ordinary text-reply lane.
|
||||
@@ -53,6 +78,7 @@ These are violations when used as the closing interaction on Telegram:
|
||||
- saying buttons will be used, but not actually sending them
|
||||
- sending explanation first, and only later sending buttons after being corrected
|
||||
- running a full test/report in plain text even though the result is obviously heading toward a pass/fail owner decision
|
||||
- starting a silent long-task without any explicit forced reporting checkpoint
|
||||
|
||||
### Required interpretation
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -63,14 +89,17 @@ The gate applies to:
|
||||
- next-step choices
|
||||
- accept / rerun / stop style decisions
|
||||
- pass / fail verdict requests
|
||||
- silent long-task launches
|
||||
|
||||
### Violation standard
|
||||
|
||||
If the assistant reaches a user-decision closure and no real inline buttons were delivered first, treat it as a workflow violation even if the reply mentioned buttons in text.
|
||||
|
||||
If a silent long-task goes dark because no forced reporting checkpoint was defined, treat it as a workflow violation even if the task later resumes.
|
||||
|
||||
### Corrective rule
|
||||
|
||||
If this violation happens:
|
||||
- acknowledge the violation plainly
|
||||
- immediately send the real button message
|
||||
- immediately send the real button message or status recovery update
|
||||
- record the lesson into workflow / memory if it exposed a missing rule
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user