diff --git a/skills/telegram-inline-buttons/SKILL.md b/skills/telegram-inline-buttons/SKILL.md
index 7758696..f5e4444 100644
--- a/skills/telegram-inline-buttons/SKILL.md
+++ b/skills/telegram-inline-buttons/SKILL.md
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ Prefer inline buttons over free-text prompts when sending a proactive Telegram m
 - Numbered option lists like `1.xxx`, `2.ooo`, `3.yyy`
 - Agent-proposed next-step menus written as `1. ... 2. ... 3. ...`
 - Hybrid prompts like `如果你要，我下一步可以：1... 2... 3...`
+- Bare lead-ins like `如果你要` followed by `1... 2... 3...`
 
 ## Do not use buttons for
 - Purely informational messages
@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ Treat these as button-worthy even if they are not written as direct questions:
 - `如果你要 ooooxxxxx`
 - `1. 立刻重發一次 2. 改成更明顯的測試文案 3. 直接在這裡做另一種測試`
 - `如果你要，我下一步可以：1. 再測一次 2. 重新打包 3. 看修正摘要`
+- `如果你要\n1. 初始化 repo\n2. 幫我產生命令\n3. 整理發布清單`
 
 These are usually implicit binary decisions or compact next-step menus and should default to inline buttons rather than requiring free-text confirmation.
 
@@ -71,12 +73,16 @@ Also good:
 - Text: `如果你要，我接下來可以這樣做：`
 - Buttons: `[先修規則] [再做測試] [直接打包]`
 
+Also good:
+- Text: `如果你要`
+- Buttons: `[初始化 repo] [產生命令] [整理清單]`
+
 Avoid leaving this as plain text like:
 ```text
-如果你要，我下一步可以
-1. 再測一次
-2. 重新打包
-3. 看修正摘要
+如果你要
+1. 初始化 repo
+2. 幫我產生命令
+3. 整理發布清單
 ```
 
 If the sentence is already natural, keep the sentence. Only convert the reply path into inline buttons.
@@ -91,6 +97,7 @@ If the sentence is already natural, keep the sentence. Only convert the reply pa
 - Prefer preserving natural Chinese phrasing and only replacing the free-text reply path with buttons
 - When the assistant proposes next steps, use buttons instead of a numbered response menu whenever the user is expected to pick one
 - For `如果你要，我下一步可以...` style prompts, keep the lead-in sentence and convert only the listed options into buttons
+- For `如果你要` followed by a numbered list on later lines, treat the lead-in as natural context and convert the listed options into buttons
 
 Recommended layouts:
 - Binary: one row `[Yes] [No]`
@@ -100,6 +107,7 @@ Recommended layouts:
 - Implicit yes/no: `[好，繼續] [先不要]`, `[要] [不用]`, `[現在做] [稍後]`
 - Next-step menu: `[立刻重發] [改文案] [另一種測試]`
 - Hybrid lead-in + options: text `如果你要，我下一步可以：` + buttons `[再測一次] [重新打包] [看修正摘要]`
+- Bare lead-in + options: text `如果你要` + buttons `[初始化 repo] [產生命令] [整理清單]`
 
 ## Telegram message tool pattern
 For user-visible delivery, use `message(action="send")` with `buttons`.
@@ -190,7 +198,11 @@ Buttons: `[立刻重發] [改文案] [另一種測試]`
 Text: `如果你要，我下一步可以：`
 Buttons: `[再測一次] [重新打包] [看修正摘要]`
 
+### Bare lead-in + options
+Text: `如果你要`
+Buttons: `[初始化 repo] [產生命令] [整理清單]`
+
 ## Decision rule
-Default to buttons whenever Eric is being asked to choose, confirm, defer, or select the next action on Telegram. This includes numbered lists that would otherwise require a reply like `1`, `2`, or `3`, implicit yes/no prompts that would otherwise require a reply like `好` or `不用`, assistant-proposed next-step menus where Eric is clearly meant to pick one option, and hybrid prompts like `如果你要，我下一步可以：1... 2... 3...`.
+Default to buttons whenever Eric is being asked to choose, confirm, defer, or select the next action on Telegram. This includes numbered lists that would otherwise require a reply like `1`, `2`, or `3`, implicit yes/no prompts that would otherwise require a reply like `好` or `不用`, assistant-proposed next-step menus where Eric is clearly meant to pick one option, hybrid prompts like `如果你要，我下一步可以：1... 2... 3...`, and bare lead-ins like `如果你要` followed by numbered options.
 
 When the original wording is already natural Chinese, keep the wording and just turn the response path into buttons.