Prefer button-driven flows for Telegram test verdicts
This commit is contained in:
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ When this skill applies:
|
||||
5. before claiming progress, check for real evidence
|
||||
6. if no evidence and no concrete action, stop the clock
|
||||
7. if the run is clearly heading toward a user pass/fail or accept/reject judgement on Telegram, prepare a button-path before the final handoff
|
||||
8. if the entire test itself exists to validate Telegram decision closure, run it as a button-driven flow rather than a normal long plain-text report
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -198,6 +199,7 @@ When operating under long-task governance on Telegram:
|
||||
- if a choice is genuinely required, use Telegram inline buttons
|
||||
- if buttons are required, send them first via the `message` tool rather than first producing a normal text reply
|
||||
- if the workflow can already predict the final handoff is a user judgement, move to a button-path before the final closing paragraph
|
||||
- if the test's whole point is to validate button closure, prefer a button-driven flow from the outset
|
||||
- if no real choice is needed, execute the most reasonable next step directly
|
||||
- if the assistant accidentally emits a plain-text choice menu, or says buttons will be used without actually sending them first, treat that as a workflow violation and convert the lesson into a permanent rule
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user