fix: reject dry-run dispatch as continuity receipt
This commit is contained in:
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ const handlerPath = path.join(repoRoot, 'hooks', 'force-recall', 'handler.ts');
|
||||
const wrapperPath = path.join(repoRoot, 'scripts', 'long_task_governor_wrapper.mjs');
|
||||
const gateLockPath = path.join(repoRoot, 'scripts', 'long_task_gate_lock.mjs');
|
||||
const plannerPath = path.join(repoRoot, 'scripts', 'plan_long_task_auto_chain.mjs');
|
||||
const continuityGatePath = path.join(repoRoot, 'scripts', 'approved_plan_continuity_gate.mjs');
|
||||
const execFileAsync = promisify(execFileCallback);
|
||||
|
||||
async function importTsModule(tsPath) {
|
||||
@@ -54,6 +55,7 @@ async function prepareTempWorkspace() {
|
||||
[wrapperPath, path.join(tempWorkspace, 'scripts', 'long_task_governor_wrapper.mjs')],
|
||||
[gateLockPath, path.join(tempWorkspace, 'scripts', 'long_task_gate_lock.mjs')],
|
||||
[plannerPath, path.join(tempWorkspace, 'scripts', 'plan_long_task_auto_chain.mjs')],
|
||||
[continuityGatePath, path.join(tempWorkspace, 'scripts', 'approved_plan_continuity_gate.mjs')],
|
||||
[handlerPath, path.join(tempWorkspace, 'hooks', 'force-recall', 'handler.ts')],
|
||||
[path.join(repoRoot, 'docs', 'RULEBOOK.md'), path.join(tempWorkspace, 'docs', 'RULEBOOK.md')],
|
||||
[path.join(repoRoot, 'SOUL.md'), path.join(tempWorkspace, 'SOUL.md')],
|
||||
@@ -104,7 +106,7 @@ function buildWrapperScript(wrapperResult) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async function main() {
|
||||
await Promise.all([fs.access(wrapperPath), fs.access(gateLockPath), fs.access(plannerPath)]);
|
||||
await Promise.all([fs.access(wrapperPath), fs.access(gateLockPath), fs.access(plannerPath), fs.access(continuityGatePath)]);
|
||||
const { default: forceRecall } = await importTsModule(handlerPath);
|
||||
assert.equal(typeof forceRecall, 'function', 'force-recall handler should export default function');
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -307,6 +309,12 @@ async function main() {
|
||||
assert.match(passInjected, /derivedAction=dispatch_spec_review/, 'hook pass-path should derive dry-run spec review dispatch');
|
||||
assert.match(passInjected, /dispatchMode=dry_run_dispatch/, 'hook pass-path should stay in dry-run dispatch mode');
|
||||
assert.match(passInjected, /autoChainAllowed=true/, 'hook pass-path should allow auto-chain in dry-run planner output');
|
||||
assert.match(passInjected, /\[APPROVED_PLAN_CONTINUITY_GATE\]/, 'hook pass-path should emit approved-plan continuity gate block');
|
||||
assert.match(passInjected, /status=continuity_failure/, 'hook pass-path should fail continuity when planner only returns dry-run dispatch without a real receipt');
|
||||
assert.match(passInjected, /verdict=continuity_failure/, 'hook pass-path should expose continuity failure verdict when no real dispatch receipt exists');
|
||||
assert.match(passInjected, /reason=missing_dispatch_receipt/, 'hook pass-path should require a real dispatch receipt instead of treating dry-run dispatch as one');
|
||||
assert.match(passInjected, /Route back to continuity failure until a real next dispatch receipt exists/, 'hook pass-path should hard-gate normal closeout until a real receipt exists');
|
||||
assert.doesNotMatch(passInjected, /\[APPROVED_PLAN_CONTINUITY_GATE\][\s\S]*status=pass/, 'hook pass-path should not let approved-plan continuity pass on dry-run dispatch alone');
|
||||
|
||||
const failInjected = await withPatchedWrapper(buildWrapperScript({
|
||||
classification: 'long_task',
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user