From 099fdca2bc626fa33ed6fd9dd4b77131cb87bf09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eve <eve@ai.cowbay.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:44:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] skills: add hybrid lead-in option-menu trigger

---
 dist/telegram-inline-buttons-repo/README.md |  8 ------
 skills/telegram-inline-buttons/SKILL.md     | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dist/telegram-inline-buttons-repo/README.md b/dist/telegram-inline-buttons-repo/README.md
index dc8d783..a462562 100644
--- a/dist/telegram-inline-buttons-repo/README.md
+++ b/dist/telegram-inline-buttons-repo/README.md
@@ -17,11 +17,3 @@ npx skills add <owner>/<repo> --skill telegram-inline-buttons -g -y
 
 ## Included skill
 - `skills/telegram-inline-buttons/SKILL.md`
-
-## What it teaches
-Prefer Telegram inline buttons when asking Eric to:
-- confirm yes/no
-- answer implicit yes/no (`如果你要...`)
-- choose from numbered options (`1/2/3`)
-- pick one of assistant-proposed next steps
-- keep natural Chinese wording and only change the reply path to buttons
diff --git a/skills/telegram-inline-buttons/SKILL.md b/skills/telegram-inline-buttons/SKILL.md
index 3578019..7758696 100644
--- a/skills/telegram-inline-buttons/SKILL.md
+++ b/skills/telegram-inline-buttons/SKILL.md
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Prefer inline buttons over free-text prompts when sending a proactive Telegram m
 - Picking one of a few next actions
 - Numbered option lists like `1.xxx`, `2.ooo`, `3.yyy`
 - Agent-proposed next-step menus written as `1. ... 2. ... 3. ...`
+- Hybrid prompts like `如果你要，我下一步可以：1... 2... 3...`
 
 ## Do not use buttons for
 - Purely informational messages
@@ -29,6 +30,7 @@ Treat these as button-worthy even if they are not written as direct questions:
 - `如果你要我繼續，我就直接做`
 - `如果你要 ooooxxxxx`
 - `1. 立刻重發一次 2. 改成更明顯的測試文案 3. 直接在這裡做另一種測試`
+- `如果你要，我下一步可以：1. 再測一次 2. 重新打包 3. 看修正摘要`
 
 These are usually implicit binary decisions or compact next-step menus and should default to inline buttons rather than requiring free-text confirmation.
 
@@ -58,6 +60,27 @@ Avoid:
 ```
 when the whole point is to let Eric choose one.
 
+## Hybrid natural-language + numbered-options rule
+When the message uses a natural Chinese lead-in and then lists next actions, preserve the lead-in and turn the numbered choices into buttons.
+
+Good:
+- Text: `如果你要，我下一步可以：`
+- Buttons: `[再測一次] [重新打包] [看修正摘要]`
+
+Also good:
+- Text: `如果你要，我接下來可以這樣做：`
+- Buttons: `[先修規則] [再做測試] [直接打包]`
+
+Avoid leaving this as plain text like:
+```text
+如果你要，我下一步可以
+1. 再測一次
+2. 重新打包
+3. 看修正摘要
+```
+
+If the sentence is already natural, keep the sentence. Only convert the reply path into inline buttons.
+
 ## Button design
 - Keep labels short: 1-4 words
 - 2-4 buttons is ideal
@@ -67,6 +90,7 @@ when the whole point is to let Eric choose one.
 - When the source prompt is implicit yes/no, convert it into a clear binary choice without changing the underlying intent
 - Prefer preserving natural Chinese phrasing and only replacing the free-text reply path with buttons
 - When the assistant proposes next steps, use buttons instead of a numbered response menu whenever the user is expected to pick one
+- For `如果你要，我下一步可以...` style prompts, keep the lead-in sentence and convert only the listed options into buttons
 
 Recommended layouts:
 - Binary: one row `[Yes] [No]`
@@ -75,6 +99,7 @@ Recommended layouts:
 - Numbered list: `[1] [2] [3]` or short labels derived from each option
 - Implicit yes/no: `[好，繼續] [先不要]`, `[要] [不用]`, `[現在做] [稍後]`
 - Next-step menu: `[立刻重發] [改文案] [另一種測試]`
+- Hybrid lead-in + options: text `如果你要，我下一步可以：` + buttons `[再測一次] [重新打包] [看修正摘要]`
 
 ## Telegram message tool pattern
 For user-visible delivery, use `message(action="send")` with `buttons`.
@@ -161,7 +186,11 @@ Buttons: `[好，開始] [先不要]`
 Text: `要怎麼測比較好？`
 Buttons: `[立刻重發] [改文案] [另一種測試]`
 
+### Hybrid lead-in + options
+Text: `如果你要，我下一步可以：`
+Buttons: `[再測一次] [重新打包] [看修正摘要]`
+
 ## Decision rule
-Default to buttons whenever Eric is being asked to choose, confirm, defer, or select the next action on Telegram. This includes numbered lists that would otherwise require a reply like `1`, `2`, or `3`, implicit yes/no prompts that would otherwise require a reply like `好` or `不用`, and assistant-proposed next-step menus where Eric is clearly meant to pick one option.
+Default to buttons whenever Eric is being asked to choose, confirm, defer, or select the next action on Telegram. This includes numbered lists that would otherwise require a reply like `1`, `2`, or `3`, implicit yes/no prompts that would otherwise require a reply like `好` or `不用`, assistant-proposed next-step menus where Eric is clearly meant to pick one option, and hybrid prompts like `如果你要，我下一步可以：1... 2... 3...`.
 
 When the original wording is already natural Chinese, keep the wording and just turn the response path into buttons.